It’s not your everyday, run of the mill design problem. But it is an everyday reality – cows produce significant amounts of the greenhouse gas (GHG), methane, and concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are therefore point sources of GHG pollution. There are arguments for ending the CAFO practice, but these controversial land uses appear to be with us for the foreseeable future anyway. Can the impacts be mitigated? Can agroforestry techniques be used to mitigate the emissions, and, if you plant a lot of trees, do you still have enough open land to maintain farm functionality? These are the questions asked by the ESF graduate student, Au Ta, in his capstone project, supervised by Dayton Reuter and me. His study produced some very interesting results.
Graduate students in landscape architecture programs sometimes produce studies that are worthy of peer-reviewed publication, but these projects often remain hidden in their respective departments. As a discipline, we need to move toward the expectation that this work will be published, either in traditional print media or through online journals. Our colleagues in other disciplines would not squander these resources! Like many LA graduate theses and capstones, Au’s project was not designed from the outset to be a carefully controlled study, but instead evolved over time into something interesting, thought-provoking, and not necessarily easy to publish in science journals because of the degree of intuitive design involved. But the project is well-crafted and reaches some surprising conclusions. Click continue reading to read the abstract and get a link to the entire paper.
Buffering climate change: Using the design process to explore carbon sequestration potential of vegetative systems on a commercial dairy farm
Research and manuscript by Ta Kieu Thien Au
Abstract:
In response to global climate change, strategies are being sought to manage greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this study, hypothetical landscape designs were developed for a commercial dairy farm to explore the possible implications of implementing mitigation strategies at a local scale. Focusing on the use of vegetative buffers to sequester carbon, alternative designs were created to achieve mitigation targets of 20%, 35% and 50% through carbon offsets and sequestration. The landscape designs demonstrated that GHG emissions from dairy cattle on the Central New York farm could be mitigated by up to 50% of existing conditions using approximately 20% of the area managed by the farm. An assessment of the designs indicated that higher percentages of GHG reduction were achieved through buffer designs that emphasized sequestration efficiencies over species diversity, resulting in landscapes dominated by Populus spp. Further study incorporating additional GHG sources and mitigation options are desired to develop a whole farm GHG plan, as well as to understand the potential of using the agricultural landscape to mitigate emissions on a regional scale.
Keywords: agroforestry, alternative designs, carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emission, dairy farming, vegetative buffers
Link to manuscript using iCloud
He DID PUBLISH!!!
Yes, I guess you can say he did. When we were working on the manuscript a couple of years ago, we were only thinking about traditional journal publication, and we targeted the wrong journal. When we reached a dead end, Au didn’t want to go through the whole process again since he had other things that needed his attention. This is how a lot of good work is lost. I am very interested in the way that digital publication and open peer review can liberate scholarship and improve its quality. It’s the new frontier for academics. Others already know this…